tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC February 14, 2013 9:00pm-10:00pm EST
26-year-old who really had it together. >> yeah. i never saw any sign of temper from oscar. i know that he was a bit of a risk taker. you know, he liked fast cars and fast boats and in the last couple of years his advisers and family were trying to tell him, look, stop taking all these chances. and he understood his obligations to his sponsors. and all the endorsements he had not to get into some goofy accident. but i certainly never saw any sign of his temper. you know, i've interviewed other athletes where after the fact you say yeah, i could see that from that guy, you know. but not this -- i never saw this one coming. never. >> mary carillo, nbc sports contributor, thanks for joining us on "the ed show" tonight. >> sure. >> and that is "the ed show." i'm ed schultz. the "rachel maddow show" starts right now. good evening, rachel. >> good evening, ed. thank you, my friend. >> you bet. >> and thanks to you at home for joining us this hour on a day
that made history. today something happened in american politics that has never before happened in the history of our republic. in all of the trials and tribulations we have been through as a nation, through the wars, through the great depression, through the time when senators used to beat one another with canes inside the capitol, in everything we have ever been through as a nation what happened today has never happened before. not ever. not one of the 44 presidents our country has had has ever been blocked by a minority in the senate from choosing someone for his cabinet. but that happened today to president barack obama. republicans in the senate decided to do something unprecedented to him. and to thereby set an entirely new precedent for how the presidency itself is treated in our country. when they said today that even though they could not muster a majority of votes on their side, they would maneuver anyway as a minority to block president
barack obama from appointing his chosen secretary of defense. this has never happened before to anyone ever. i mean, we have had cabinet nominees not make it through the senate confirmation process before. people who could not win over a majority of the senate. so they did not get confirmed. we've had that happen. we've had plenty of people pull their name from contention when it became clear that they couldn't win a majority vote, that they could not win confirmation in the senate. but president obama's nominee for defense secretary, chuck hagel, he does have majority support in the senate. what happened today is that a minority of that body, the republicans, decided that they were going to block him anyway. never happened before. they filibustered a cabinet nomination. in the past over the years there have been a couple of token efforts at maybe doing this in the past, that got a handful of votes, didn't actually slow down or stop anything. but the minority actually blocking the nomination, that is
a whole new thing. this is a fresh hell in american politics. and that is why before today even republican senators said it would be nuts to do this. before today these senators, these republicans, for example, all said, yeah, listen, i might be opposed to chuck hagel for defense, i might vote no on his nomination, but i'm not going to blow up 220-something years of precedent and filibuster the guy. i'm not going to block there being a vote on him. we've never done that before. republican senators john mccain, ray blunt, roger wicker, lindsey graham, susan murkowski, all these republican senators said before today they might vote no on chuck hagel but they wouldn't block a vote from the minority. they wouldn't filibuster. well, today when push came to shofr it was only susan collins and lisa murkowski who kept their word. all the others said that they wouldn't filibuster, that that would be wrong, and then they did it anyway. john mccain, roy blunt, roger
wicker, lindsey graham all said they wouldn't do it, and then they did. senator graham for his part says he does not want his filibuster today to be thought of as a filibuster even though that's what it is. he said he prefers to think of what he did today as just blocking the nomination because he wants to use it as leverage to get more information out of the administration on the president's birth certificate. i'm sorry, i mean fast and furious. i'm sorry, i mean aliens in area 51. i'm sorry, i mean his theories about what happened in benghazi. what does nominee chuck hagel know about benghazi? precisely nothing. he has nothing to do with it. he had nothing to do with it. but lindsey graham is filibustering his nomination over it anyway. i mean, since chuck hagel had nothing to do with it substantively, why block his nomination instead of, say, the john kerry nomination, which sailed through the senate? don't know. why not? wrecking stuff is fun maybe?
hulk smash? the guy who the republicans waited to spring this on for the first time in our nax's history, to break all precedent, is our former republican senator from a red state, a decorated and wounded combat veteran nominated to lead the pentagon while we are at war. republicans have never before felt the need to filibuster a cabinet member in the history of the country but apparently now this is the time and this is the guy worth waiting 224 years to spring it on. it has never happened before, but why not now? heck. the white house is not pleased. "today's action runs against both the majority will of the senate and our nation's interest. this waste of time is not without consequence. we have 66,000 men and women deployed in afghanistan, and we need our new secretary of defense to be a part of significant decisions about how we bring that war to a responsible end. next week in brussels, the united states will meet with our allies to talk about the transition in afghanistan at the nato defense ministerial, and our next secretary of defense
should be there. for the sake of national security, it's time to stop playing politics with our department of defense and to move beyond the distractions and delay. allow this war hero an up or down vote, and let our troops have the secretary of defense they deserve." do you remember when the top democrat in the senate, harry reid, declared just a few weeks ago the democrats would not change the rules in the senate? remember that? wouldn't change the rules to stop senate republicans from abusing the process there. harry reid decided he would just instead make a handshake deal with the republicans' top senator, mitch mcconnell. he said he was satisfied with the republicans just agreeing to be more reasonable on issues like this. remember? they wouldn't change the filibuster rules. they would just agree as gentlemen that the republicans would curtail the excesses of filibustering everything and effectively ruling from the minority. democrats decided to not change the rules on the filibuster and just make that agreement with the republicans instead.
they said, you know, at a minimum this will at least improve the confirmation process for the administration's nominees. how is that working out now? just a couple of weeks later. how's that gentleman's agreement going? now that we've just had a filibuster of a cabinet nominee for the first time in american history. joining us now is andrea mitchell, nbc's chief foreign affairs correspondent, the host of "andrea mitchell reports" on msnbc. andr andrea, it's great having you here tonight. >> thank you very much. thanks, rachel. >> what happens next here? does leon panetta stay on as defense secretary even after he has gone through all the motions of stepping down and heading back home? >> yes. we have had all these farewell speeches. the most recent today. and then he went off with his wife, sylvia, for a valentine's dinner. and was hoping that he wouldn't have to come back. but now he will come back because the senate is in recess. when these things happen they don't change their blanz for recess.
so leon panetta, the lame duck defense secretary-s going to have to lead the delegation and represent the united states at nato in brussels for the annual meeting, the big meeting of the nato defense ministers. and this was supposed to be the debut performance of chuck hagel on the world stage. and that is only the first impediment to hagel by this delay and this -- what they claim, the republicans claim is not a filibuster, but by any stretch of the imagination when you have a cloture vote and you get 58 votes and your nominee then cannot get a vote on the floor and they go into recess, that sort of smells luke a filibuster. >> have you heard anything about how people inside the defense department and even the state department, the other national security major agencies, how they're reacting tonight? is there any concern that this holdup is going to project weakness or otherwise be bad for the country? >> i think there's a lot of embarrassment and annoyance, anger. we do have leon panetta. we have ash carter, the deputy
defense secretary. so there is leadership. you know, the other sort of incidental but not unimportant victim of all of this is also john brennan's nomination. whatever you think of it. that has also been held up until after the recess. for very good reasons, many say, because dianne feinstein, the head of the intelligence committee, is now demanding seven more legal documents on targeted killings from the administration. the administration says that that's an exaggeration, that some of those were already turned over actually were simply expansions of some of the seven she's demanding. but in any case, you're not going to have a cia director either until after the recess. >> if chuck hagel ultimately ends up confirmed, and that was part of the white house statement today saying listen, he has majority support, he got 58 votes on the cloture vote today, which implies he is going to be confirmed, if they ever allow a vote. once we get defense secretary chuck hagel, what does what we just went through mean for what the relationship's going to be
like between congress and the pentagon? congress and the pentagon are a little bit at each other's throats right now anyway because of the negotiations around the sequester and how the pentagon budget is going to proceed not only over this next year but over the next few years. what's it going to mean between congress and the pentagon once chuck hagel's in charge after they made him go through this? >> well, if the president thought that by having a republican in the cabinet at the pentagon he was going to buy any kind of loyalty or relationship with republican senators, he can think again about that. because this simply isn't happening. chuck hagel is not going to have relationships with the people who have just humiliated him to this degree. secondly, he was weak eened by s own poor performance. and whether he was playing rope-a-dope and this was a deliberate tactic, as they say, to not pick a fight and get into an argument in a public forum with john mccain and the others on the committee that he would then have to work with, he didn't fight back enough claire mccaskill and other democrats, claire you saw on our show and
others saying look, he clearly is better at asking questions than answering questions but still came strongly to his defrks defense, as did the other democrats on the committee, joe manchin and others, saying he is clearly qualified and the president should have his man there and that to take one statement out of context from a speech that he gave when he wasn't in office is not really taking the measure of the man. he's not going to have a good relationship with republicans on that committee, and he is weakened within the pentagon, where you have that crisp military be prepared attitude. you know it better than anyone. you've written a book -- you've been with the military far more than i have. and rachel, you know that they have things all down very, very carefully. and the way he performed, the way he answered the questions, that was damaging to him despite all of the incombiums from so many people, from brent scowcroft and colin powell and people who republicans admire
and revere, who have all said this man should be confirmed. >> i think we are at an important and fragile and sort of unsettled moment in terms of civilian relationships with the military, in particular political civilian relationships with the military. and this is the biggest wrench in the works i could have possibly imagined. we will have to see how it plays out. andrea mitchell, nbc's chief foreign affairs correspondent, host of "andrea mitchell reports" on msnbc. andrea, as always, thank you so much for being here. >> my pleasure. >> all right. the president left washington today for the comparatively grownup environment of a room full of 4-year-olds. it went well. that's coming up. i was in the ambulance
and i was told to call my next of kin. at 33 years old, i was having a heart attack. now i'm on a bayer aspirin regimen. [ male announcer ] be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. i didn't know this could happen so young. take control, talk to your doctor. prego?! but i've been buying ragu for years. [ thinking ] i wonder what other questionable choices i've made? [ club scene music ] [ sigh of relief ] [ male announcer ] choose taste. choose prego.
[ sigh of relief ] did you just turn your ringer off so no one would interrupt and.us?one. oh no, i... just used my geico app to get a tow truck. it's gonna be 30 minutes. oh, so that means that we won't be stuck up here, for hours, with nothing to do. oh i get it, you wanna pass the time, huh. (holds up phone) fruit ninja!!! emergency roadside assistance. just a click away with the geico mobile app. all stations come over to mithis is for real this time. step seven point two one two. verify and lock. command is locked. five seconds. three, two, one. standing by for capture. the most innovative software on the planet... dragon is captured.
is connecting today's leading companies to places beyond it. siemens. answers. this man was the democratic nominee for president in the year 1984. he served as vice president in the late '70s and in the very early 1970s, as you see him here in all his early 1970s glory he was a senator. senator walter mondale, democrat of minnesota. mr. mondale entered the u.s. senate at the beginning of our national war on poverty under lbj. senator mondale outlasted president johnson in office, but he kept working on that basic idea, of using public policy to help out the least well off among us. by 1971 he succeeded in getting passed with big bipartisan support a bill that would have created a daycare system essentially in this country. universal preschool for american kids. the tuition was on a sliding scale so everybody could afford it. senator mondale got his bill
passed and it went to the guy who was president by then. it went to richard nixon. and richard nikxon vetoed it evn though it passed with lots of republican votes. president nixon said the idea of preschool for everyone had "family-weakening implications." he said, "the child development envisioned in this legislation would be truly a long leap into the dark for the united states government and the american people." a long leap into the dark. 40 years after president nixon said no to preschool for all american kids with the weird leaping in the dark analogy, president obama is trying to bring a version of that idea back with a plan for early education for all americans. but this time the president has wind in his sails blowing in from an unlikely source. it's blowing in from a really, really red state. from maybe the reddest of all red states. this is how oklahoma voted in 2012. mitt romney swept every county. in 2008 john mccain swept every county.
in 2004 george bush swept every county. oklahoma is the reddest place we've got in america. and republicans, you may have heard, like to think that they do not think much of the policy ideas of barack obama. which is why it was so interesting to hear the two states that president obama mentioned as models when he announced his state of the union plan for preschool. >> tonight i propose working with states to make high-quality preschool available to every single child in america. [ applause ] in states that make it a priority to educate our youngest children, like georgia or oklahoma, studies show students grow up more likely to read and do math at grade level, graduate high school, hold a job, form more stable families of their own. >> president obama took that proposal on the road, visiting a prek class, pre-kindergarten class in decatur, georgia. he played a game of i spy with
the kids there and noticed the magnifying class glancy drew style. he had phonics. he did the kinds of things you do in pre-k if you have pre-k where you live like they do in georgia. georgia is a conservative state. but no state is conservative like oklahoma is, right? and yet oklahoma has had universal pre-kindergarten since the late 1990s. and they got it in the most amazing way. the story starts with this guy, joe edins. he's a rancher, a biology teacher, an oklahoma state representative, and that rarest of all oklahoma political critters, joe eddins is a democrat. at the time he got to office in 1994 oklahomans were putting 4-year-olds in school because the law allowed them to and because a glitch in state law said inadvefrtentally oklahoma schools would get paid for having extra kids enrolled in kindergarten. well, they started putting 4-year-olds in kindergarten and it turned out putting
pre-kindergarten aged kids in kindergarten classes didn't necessarily suit those kids all that well. so mr. eddins proposed closing the loopholes that let 4-year-olds be in oklahoma's kindergarten classrooms. but when he did that, he snuck in way deep in the legislative thicket of the where for's and the hereby withes he snuck in an entirely different grade, for prekindergarten for those kids he kicked out of kindergarten for being too young to be there. in doing so he gave oklahoma the most successful pre-kindergarten education program in the entire united states of america. and it was all done kind of on the qt. joe eddins, oklahoma state rep, hoped that nobody would catch on to what he was doing. but it worked. oklahoma's pre-k kids got a chance to learn their letters and their numbers and their colors and how you wait your turn and you take only your own graham cracker and you nap when you are told to nap. on the world's greatest radio show, "this american life," my friend alex bloomberg got a chance to ask joe eddins about
how this all happened, about his sneak bill. alex asked whether mr. eddins could have gotten this thing done in oklahoma if people had really known what he was doing at the time he was doing it. listen. >> i don't see it ever being funded if you had it like other states do. if you had to say here's a program that we want to implement. here's how much money it'll take. whoo, where are you going to get the money? okay? if you would have to have a line item appropriation, nobody would have supported it except the young mothers, and they have no political clout. >> what lessons could other states -- say, other states want to try to do something like this? >> they don't have a prayer. they don't have a prayer. they don't have a prayer. because it's expensive. and there's -- state legislatures are run by people that don't want -- they want to cut programs, not add programs.
>> those are states haven't got a prayer of getting what oklahoma kids got. what oklahoma kids got by stealth. and now oklahoma loves. oklahoma loves it because kids in oklahoma just a few years into this started making truly long leaps in their letters and their spelling and their problem solving. oklahoma kids made truly long leaps. black kids, white kids, native american kids, hispanic kids. everybody. it really worked. and yes, it costs money to do this. but the academics who track this stuff say that the earlier you invest in a child's development the more you get back. they say that this is among the smartest money you can spend in public policy. and that was president obama's case this week. >> we know this works. so let's do what works and make sure none of our children start the race of life already behind. let's give our kids that chance. >> we know this works. specifically, we know this works in the reddest of all of the red states. we are not used to policy being
extrapolated from oklahoma to the whole country. and i do not mean to offend oklahoma with that statement. it just doesn't really happen. but could this be the time with this democratic president saying hey, you know what? georgia and oklahoma are doing it right. and the whole country should follow their lead. could it work? after all, richard nixon is not going to veto it this time. joining us now is james heckman. he's a nobel prize winner and professor of economics at the university of chicago. he is an advocate for the idea that you can increase equality by investing more in very little kids. professor heckman, thank you so much for being here tonight. >> it's my pleasure to be here. >> in the states that have the kind of program that the president is calling for, are there any lessons to be learned? clear lessons about what works and what doesn't work, what might be extrapolatable to a larger platform or to other states. >> well, it's not just a question of these particular states, although they're models and they provide an example. but there are many programs that have been evaluated for many, many years where we can see what
the economic and social benefits are of these programs. and so i think it's important to draw lessons from a broader portfolio of policies that have been implemented. >> what is -- what explains or what is it about these programs that is so economically beneficial? what gives us such a bang for the buck is the way we think of this as a policy matter. >> you're asking for the particulars of why they work or -- >> mm-hmm. >> -- just how it's evaluated? >> or how we know that they work. >> well, we know they work because we've actually done experiments where we give people these programs, randomly assign them, and others are not rand randomly assigned, and we follow these people for as long as 40 or 50 years in their lifetimes to see what the benefits are of these programs in terms of their income, in terms of their participation in crime, even in terms of their health, and in terms of their schooling and many other dimensions of social performance. >> are there specific aspects of the type of pre-k or early education that have larger
benefits later on? i mean, pre-k education can be lots of different things. lots of different states have different standards. do we know anything about what is most important about getting it right if you want to get those kind of benefits? >> well, getting it right involves putting quality into the program. there's no question. you can't do it on the cheap. that's for sure. >> what is -- what do you look for in terms of quality education? what are you spending more money to get? >> well, we have to understand what these programs are doing. these programs are working with children and with families. and they're supplementing the family lives of disadvantaged children. that's really the ingredient. the successful ingredient is really asking how you can replicate for disadvantaged children the kind of advantages that more -- that children from wealthier and upper-class environments come from. get. >> how does that speak to the prospect of having this as a universal benefit, something that kids of all different advantage levels or economic strata, all sorts of different demographic orientations, how does it speak to that being
something that everybody gets if it disproportionately benefits kids who are from worse off background? >> first of all, you have to understand, as you said yourself in your introduction, the proposed idea, i guess going back to walter mondale, was a sliding-fee schedule. everybody could have access to these programs. but the payment would vary depending on the income level and the degree of disadvantage. >> in terms of the politics here, i know that you're not a political scientist in these matters -- >> no. >> -- but do you think there is -- do you think that there is an economically and scientifically sound argument to make to counter the political conservative concerns that this is going to supplant family life in some way, it's going to undermine family living? is there something we know from the data that could be used politically in that -- >> see, it's interesting. i hadn't realized this quotation you read from richard nixon. it's just the opposite. these programs are actually bolstering family life. we know that one of the biggest challenges and something president obama and many
politicians can't say, one of the biggest challenges in american society is the changing family environment, especially for disadvantaged kids. a lot of kids are born into environments where they're not getting the same stimulation. sing single-parent families where the mothers are high school dropouts or not very well educated. are not getting the same benefits as children from more advantaged homes. and that has consequences. and we can remedy some of those deficits, and we can actually improve those consequences by giving those children the kind of -- at least some version supplementing the family life and giving them some of the same opportunities and working with both the parents and the children. this is really a family strategy. and this shouldn't be a liberal or democrat versus republican conflict. this should really be something that should resonate with people who value and talk a lot about family values and also people who are interested in inequality and reducing inequality. this is one of the rare public policies that has two features.
it's economically productive. it survives very stringent analyses. and at the same time it reduces inequality and promotes social mobility. >> james heckman, nobel prize-winning professor of economics at the university of chicago. it's fascinating to have your perspective on this. thank you so much for being with us here tonight. >> okay. thank you. >> thank you. that last point that he made, i think somebody should cut that into a youtube clip and send it to everybody they know on facebook maybe. maybe we'll do that in the commercial break. no, i'm busy. we'll be right back. drives that limousine. current events. comfortable temperature. biceps. he maintains everything for your pleasure. he has the nicest car you can think of, but longer. with one hand he can roll down 10 windows plus the partition. everything he does, tacks right off. and of course he dines upon the liquid gold of velveeta shells and cheese. end of story. liquid gold. eat like that guy you know. wears off.
[ female announcer ] stop searching and start repairing. eucerin professional repair moisturizes while actually repairing very dry skin. the end of trial and error has arrived. try a free sample at eucerinus.com. the end of trial and error has arrived. a hybrid? most are just no fun to drive. now, here's one that will make you feel alive. meet the five-passenger ford c-max hybrid. c-max says ha. c-max says wheeee. which is what you get, don't you see? cause c-max has lots more horsepower than prius v, a hybrid that c-max also bests in mpg. say hi to the all-new 47 combined mpg c-max hybrid. you know who you are. you can part a crowd, without saying a word... if you have yet to master the quiet sneeze... you stash tissues like a squirrel stashes nuts... well muddlers, muddle no more.
try zyrtec®. it gives you powerful allergy relief. and zyrtec® is different than claritin® because zyrtec® starts working at hour one on the first day you take it. claritin® doesn't start working until hour three. zyrtec®. love the air. did you know not all fiber is the same? citrucel is different- it's the only fiber for regularity that won't cause excess gas. it's gentle and clinically proven to help restore and maintain regularity. look for citrucel today. you know, from our 4,000 television commercials. yep, there i am with flo. hoo-hoo! watch it! [chuckles] anyhoo, 3 million people switched to me last year, saving an average of $475. yeah, i'm kind of a big deal. [sigh] it feels good to help people save... with great discounts like safe driver, multicar, and multipolicy. 731, 732... you want my number, don't you? call 1-800-progressive right now. or visit progressive.com for an extra $50 online savings.
thirsty? 'cause i got a six-pack right here. oh, yeah... [voice shaking] you don't even have to wait for your policy to expire to switch. oh, svetlana, that's so good! and, with every policy, you get great service. a-down the hizz-atch. [slurp!] so call me today. you'll be glad you did. cannonbox! [splash!] as we promised you, we've got exclusive footage just ahead from a new msnbc documentary that i think is probably going to rattle a lot of very famous cages. we've got our first clip of that exclusively coming up. i'm a conservative investor.
but that doesn't mean i don't want to make money. i love making money. i try to be smart with my investments. i also try to keep my costs down. what's your plan? ishares. low cost and tax efficient. find out why nine out of ten large professional investors choose ishares for their etfs. ishares by blackrock. call 1-800-ishares for a prospectus which includes investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. read and consider it carefully before investing. risk includes possible loss of principal. you know it can be hard to lbreathe, and how that feels.e, copd includes chronic bronchitis and emphysema. spiriva helps control my copd symptoms by keeping my airways open for 24 hours. plus, it reduces copd flare-ups. spiriva is the only once-daily inhaled copd maintenance treatment that does both. spiriva handihaler tiotropium bromide inhalation powder
does not replace fast-acting inhalers for sudden symptoms. tell your doctor if you have kidney problems, glaucoma, trouble urinating, or an enlarged prostate. these may worsen with spiriva. discuss all medicines you take, even eye drops. stop taking spiriva and seek immediate medical help if your breathing suddenly worsens, your throat or tongue swells, you get hives, vision changes or eye pain, or problems passing urine. other side effects include dry mouth and constipation. nothing can reverse copd. spiriva helps me breathe better. (blowing sound) ask your doctor about spiriva. ♪ pop goes the world pop in a whole new kind of clean with tide pods. just one pac has the stain removal power of six caps of the bargain brand. pop in. stand out. of six caps of the bargain brand. try running four.ning a restaurant is hard, fortunately we've got ink.
it gives us 5x the rewards on our internet, phone charges and cable, plus at office supply stores. rewards we put right back into our business. this is the only thing we've ever wanted to do and ink helps us do it. make your mark with ink from chase. clamp. glitter. [ male announcer ] staples makes it easier to get everything your business needs. even custom banners. and now get 50% off banners and posters. staples. that was easy. at the state of the union members of congress until a couple of years ago used to sit with their own party. so partisan dividing lines became almost architectural. the republican side clearly evident, jumping up and applaud things that they liked all as a group while the democrats sat and waited sullenly for their turn. and then the other side, the other side of the room would
jump up and the republican side would all sit down. that's the way it was for years. but we don't do it that way anymore because for the past couple of years it is non-partisan seating. they go out of their way now to sit next to someone from the other party. so republicans and democrats at the state of the union now are all mixed together. congress started doing it that way just in 2011 when the state of the union that year was scheduled just days after the mass shooting in tucson, arizona that killed six people and that nearly killed congresswoman gabby giffords. her intern daniel hernandez, who helped save her that day, and her surgeon, both of them went to the state of the union that year, as did the parents of the little girl, christina taylor green, who was killed in that shooting. arizona's congressional delegation held open a seat for gabby giffords herself that year, and the president mentioned her right at the top of the speech. but even with all of that attention to what had just happened days earlier in tucson, tucson was not discussed that year at the state of the union as a catalyst for policy change. the president made no mention in
that year's speech of the problem of gun violence or any related policy reforms. that was in 2011. one of the most moving moments of the next state of the union, the following year, 2012, happened before the president began his speech. as lawmakers filled the room, a quiet applause started up in the chamber and initially it was hard to tell why people were clapping. but as the applause continued to build, it became clear that the capitol was applauding louder and louder and with more and more emotion for gabby giffords because she was there and she made her way to her seat. she was in the chamber for the president's speech that night, one year after suffering a gunshot to the head. gabby giffords' husband, astronaut mark kelly, was also there in 2012. he was seated with the first lady. but yet again in 2012, even with that very emotional presence, there was no mention from the president about gun violence or related reform as a matter of policy. this year finally things were different. the first visual reminders of
gun violence that we saw at the speech this year were the green ribbons, right? vice president joe biden wore one. several members of congress did as well. in honor of the kids and the educators who died in the mass shooting at sandy hook elementary school in newtown, connecticut. green and white are the school's colors at sandy hook elementary. in addition to the green ribbons, which were everywhere, more than 30 people who were personally affected by gun violence, people who lost their child or another loved one, more than 30 people with that connection to gun violence were in the gallery, were in the audience watching the speech. people who lost loved ones in mass shootings like aurora and newtown and tucson or in the kind of one-off gun violence that happens every day in our country. accidental shootings, drive-by shootings, workplace shootings. the parents of one of the little girls killed at sandy hook, grace mcdonnell, her parents were there at the state of the union, along with the younger brother of vicki soto, a teacher who was killed at the school that day. two sandy hook teachers were in the audience including one who survived gunshot wounds to her foot and leg and hand. she was invited by the
congresswoman from newtown, elizabeth este. several of these folks also spoke at i apress conference on gun violence that took place before the state of the union, highlighting the fact that they would be there watching in person. first lady michelle obama had gun violence victims seated with her for the speech. she invited cleopatra and nathaniel pendleton. their 15-year-old daughter hadiya pendleton was killed last month in chicago just about a mile from the president and first lady's chicago home. the first lady also invited police lieutenant brian murphy, who was the first on the scene police officer at the oak creek, wisconsin sikh temple mass shooting in august. lieutenant murphy took 15 bullets to the head, neck, and body when he confronted that well-armed shooter that day. he survived. also seated with the first lady was another sandy hook teacher, kaitlin roig. the first lady has hosted victims of mass shootings at the state of the union before, but in past years that honor, that symbolism never translated to the speech itself. right? to policy.
well, that this year in 2013, it changed. >> senators of both parties are working together on tough new laws to prevent anyone from buying guns for resale to criminals. police chiefs are asking our help to get weapons of war and massive ammunition magazines off our streets because these police chiefs, they're tired of seeing their guys and gals being outgunned. each of these proposals deserves a vote in congress. >> if you want to vote no, that's your choice. but these proposals deserve a vote. because in the two months since newtown more than 1,000 birthdays, graduations, anniversaries have been stolen from our lives by a bullet from a gun.
more than 1,000. one of those we lost was a young girl named hadiya pendleton. she was 15 years old. she loved fig newtons. she was a majorette. she was so good to her friends they all thought they were her best friend. just three weeks ago she was here in washington with her classmates, performing for her country at my inauguration. and a week later she was shot and killed in a chicago park after school. just a mile away from my house. hadiya's parents, nate and cleo, are in this chamber tonight, along with more than two dozen americans whose lives have been torn apart by gun violence. they deserve a vote.
[ applause ] they deserve a vote. they deserve a vote. gabby giffords deserves a vote. the families of newtown deserve a vote. the families of aurora deserve a vote. the families of oak creek and tucson and blacksburg and the countless other communities ripped open by gun violence, they deserve a simple vote. >> while the president was speaking, you could see a woman wiping her eyes and holding a picture of her son. that's caroline murray. she's from illinois.
her son justin was shot and killed at 19 years old. that's whose picture she's holding. caroline was invited to the state of the union by illinois congresswoman january schakowski. today marks two-month shooting of the shooting at sandy hook elementary in newtown, connecticut. and today more than 5,000 people gathered at hartford, connecticut in the state apt capitol. many in the crowd were wearing green to honor sandy hook just as members of congress did at the state of the union speech on tuesday. the people there in hartford were there to honor the children and the educators shot and killed there two months ago but they were also there with policy demands, with demands that the country not forget sandy hook and that we specifically turn what happened there and our outrage over it into change. a lobbyist who works for the nra's wisconsin branch last week told an audience that the organization the nra is now just waiting for what he called the connecticut effect to wear off in the country before they think things will return to business as usual. you can see why they would want
to think that way. but they might be wrong. this might not wear off. at his current p e, bob will retire when he's 153, which would be fine if bob were a vampire. but he's not. ♪ he's an architect with two kids and a mortgage. luckily, he found someone who gave him a fresh perspective on his portfolio. and with some planning and effort, hopefully bob can retire at a more appropriate age. it's not rocket science. it's just common sense. from td ameritrade. [ male announcer ] we began with the rx. ♪ then we turned the page, creating the rx hybrid. ♪ now we've turned the page again with the rx f sport. ♪ this is the next chapter for the rx and the next chapter for lexus.
this is the pursuit of perfection. and the next chapter for lexus. by earning a degree in the field maof counseling or psychologyth from capella university, health. you'll have the knowledge to make a difference in the lives of others. let's get started at capella.edu. all your important legal matters in just minutes. protect your family... and launch your dreams. at legalzoom.com we put the law on your side. the battle of bataan, 1942. [ all ] fort benning, georgia, in 1999. [ male announcer ] usaa auto insurance is often handed down from generation to generation because it offers a superior level of protection and because usaa's commitment to serve the military, veterans, and their families is without equal. begin your legacy. get an auto-insurance quote.
usaa. we know what it means to serve. she pretty much lives in her favorite princess dress. and she's not exactly tidy. even if she gets a stain she'll wear it for a week straight. so i use tide to get out those week old stains and downy to get it fresh and soft. since i'm the one who has to do the laundry. i do what any expert dad would do. i let her play sheriff. i got 20 minutes to life. you are free to go. [ dad ] tide and downy. great on their own, even better together.
desire seeing. we will not rest until we have changed america. we will not rest until we have changed connecticut. we will not rest until we have done that, which makes our children safer. >> connecticut governor dan malloy today speaking at the state capitol in hartford, where more than 5,000 people turned out today, two months to the day after the newtown shootings to demand policy changes in response. joining us now is connecticut senator richard blumenthal. he serves on the senate judiciali committee. he has introduced the ammunition background check act of 2013. senator blumenthal, thank you for joining us again tonight. i really appreciate your time. >> thank you, rachel. >> it has been two months since what happened at sandy hook. you and i have talked several times on this show since the tragedy about how the nation's going to respond. what is your assessment today? particularly after the issue played such a large role at the state of the union. what's your assessment today
about how we're doing in terms of our national response? >> first and foremost, rachel, clearly the connecticut effect, as that nra spokesman termed it, and i asked the nra to repudiate it, that connecticut effect is not going away. the rally today in hartford shows it. the state of the union response shows it. where the entire chamber literally rose to its feet when the president said those measures deserve a vote, the families deserve a vote. i think we've really reached a tipping point or turning point in the national debate. and what's also different this time, as the president said, is that the nra has lost a lot of its political heft. you know, wayne lapierre has spoken the last couple of days with the kind of hate and fear that clearly consumes him but also con sines tsigns the nra a organization to the political fringe of this national debate. and certainly, he no longer
speaks for many nra members, no longer speaks for the majority of gun owners, and that's a fundamental difference as well. so i think the sense of urgency has been maintained and sustained. the momentum is there. the judiciary committee's going to mark up a bill. in other words, frame the final language of the bill next month if not this month. and those votes will occur on the floor of the senate, i hope and believe, because the president's absolutely right. those families, the victims, the first responders, all americans deserve a vote. >> in terms of the way that the president phrased that in that repetitive cadence that he had that was so moving but also very specific saying these deserve a vote, deserve a vote, deserve a vote, and he went out of his way to say if you want to vote no that's okay but we ought to vote. i wonder what your assessment is of what he's getting at there politically. my sense was that he meant the way that the gun lobby works is by preventing people from ever having to take a stand on thish,
preventing people from ever having to put themselves in the position of voting against something that would be very popular like a background check, that the way that they get what they need is by is that what you think he meant? >> i think that is exactly what he meant and i think that is our hope for what we want 90% of the american people say they are in favor of background checks for all firearms purchases. closer to 80 say they are in favor of background checks for ammunition purchases. keep in mind. right n right now the law says that criminals, drug addicts seriously ill people are barred from purchasing firearms.
not only about who deserves a vote but what measures deserve a vote. the high capacity magazine p prohibition and school safety. so there has to be a strategy and we deserve to have a vote, people can vote against it. but the american people deserve a vote. and small minority should not block it. >> senator, thank you for being here tonight. i have a feeling we are going to keep this conversation going you and i as long as you are willing to come back. msnbc is hosting a documentary monday night. i'm going to give you the first sneak peak. that is here, that is next. [ woman ] too weak.
wears off. [ female announcer ] stop searching and start repairing. eucerin professional repair moisturizes while actually repairing very dry skin. the end of trial and error has arrived. try a free sample at eucerinus.com. the ethto fight chronic.or osteoarthritis pain. to fight chronic low back pain. to take action. to take the next step.
today, you will know you did something for your pain. cymbalta can help. cymbalta is a pain reliever fda-approved to manage chronic musculoskeletal pain. one non-narcotic pill a day, every day, can help reduce this pain. tell your doctor right away if your mood worsens, you have unusual changes in mood or behavior or thoughts of suicide. anti-depressants can increase these in children, teens, and young adults. cymbalta is not for children under 18. people taking maois, linezolid or thioridazine or with uncontrolled glaucoma should not take cymbalta. taking it with nsaid pain relievers, aspirin, or blood thinners may increase bleeding risk. severe liver problems, some fatal, were reported. signs include abdominal pain and yellowing skin or eyes. tell your doctor about all your medicines, including those for migraine and while on cymbalta, call right away if you have high fever, confusion and stiff muscles or serious allergic skin reactions like blisters, peeling rash, hives, or mouth sores to address possible life-threatening conditions. talk about your alcohol use, liver disease and before you reduce or stop cymbalta. dizziness or fainting may occur upon standing.
take the next step. talk to your doctor. cymbalta can help. [ male announcer ] when you wear dentures you may not know it, but your mouth is under attack. food particles infiltrate and bacteria proliferate. ♪ protect your mouth, with fixodent. the adhesive helps create a food seal defense for a clean mouth and kills bacteria for fresh breath. ♪ fixodent, and forget it. [ male announcer ] how could switchgrass in argentina, change engineering in dubai, aluminum production in south africa, and the aerospace industry in the u.s.? at t. rowe price, we understand the connections of a complex, global economy. it's just one reason over 75% of our mutual funds beat their 10-year lipper average. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. request a prospectus or summary prospectus
with investment information, risks, fees and expenses to read and consider carefully before investing. >> what is your favorite virtue? >> integrity. judge what do you appreciate most in your friends? >> honesty. >> your idea of happiness. >> a day on the south fork with a snake and a fly rod. >> what do you consider your main fault? >> main fault, well i don't spend a lot of time thinking about my faults will be the answer. >> that is the start of a new showtime trailer. >> today with the historic ally
filibuster, we have over 60,000 americans fighting a war in afghanistan, newly heightened tensions with iran and their involvement in the terrible war next door in syria where the war continues in it's brutality, and iranian general was reportedly assassinated inside syria which means that iran has it's generals in syria. america doesn't need a secretary of defense. he has wrapped up letting him leave now.
because there is someone inside the u.s. government right now who is leaking things to the press to try to get us to go to war in syria. someone described as an obama administration official is leaking things to make it seem like syria has crossed red lines to make us get involved in that war. if sear uyria does not react strongly -- there is no proof that syria is using chemical weapons. someone inside the administration right now has been trying to make it seem like there are wmd's in syria and
syria is using them and we have to get into that war because of that. sound familiar? the difference is that it is the official line of the administration this time that we should be cautious. the last time that we should go through this everybody that administration that we should draft, they were the ones that were telling us thing that is were not true to get us to start a war. it was not that long cag, this is our first preview clip that is going to premier on monday on how that deception went down and whether we have learned from it and whether we might be susceptible again if anybody try
to do that to us again. watch. >> atta, leader of al qaeda's 911 high jackings. from prague comes a report showing him meeting with a high ranking intelligence officer. slight guy barely 5'5" and 56 skinny. the guy in the photograph was mul lar and thick and had a neck the size of two of my necks. that is not him but send it to the lab anywhere. >> in the final analysis -- >> without definitive evidence the public goes ahead with it. >> he did meet with the integ